![]() Geekbench 5 scores are calibrated against a baseline score of 1000 (which is the score of an Intel Core i3-8100). The data on this chart is gathered from user-submitted Geekbench 5 results from the Geekbench Browser. core performance is 200 points or so higher than the one already added to the Mac charts. Benchmark results for the MacBook Pro (15-inch Late 2011) with an Intel Core i7-2760QM processor can be found below. In order to see how much of a performance boost the new models bring, I’ve collected 32-bit Geekbench 2 results for all of the models available on the Geekbench Browser. MacBook Pro (13-inch Late 2016 Escape) Geekbench 4 scores. Oh, if you're curious how your computer stacks up against the new MacBook Pros you can download Geekbench and find out (it's a free download). JJohn Poole Geekbench 2 results are starting to appear on the Geekbench Browser for the new MacBook Airs and the new MacBook Pros announced yesterday. Also, keep in mind that Geekbench 2 only measures processor and memory performance it won't measure the benefits of new video cards or storage devices. If you're not familiar with Geekbench 2, higher Geekbench 2 scores are better. What I was curious to know, though, was how fast are these new processors? How much of a performance benefit do the Sandy Bridge processors bring to the MacBook Pro lineup? I grabbed Geekbench 2 scores from the Geekbench Browser for the current- and previous-generation MacBook Pro models in order to answer that question. What I'm most excited about are the new Sandy Bridge processors (especially now that Apple finally has a quad-core laptop). Benchmark results for the MacBook Pro (15-inch Late 2011) with an Intel Core i7-2760QM processor can be found below. Those who want that level of graphics performance or higher will be better off selecting an M1 Max MacBook Pro.Even though Apple's new MacBook Pros look like the old MacBook Pros, there's a lot that's new and exciting under the hood, like a completely new peripheral interface (Thunderbolt) and the new AMD GPUs. MacBook Pro (15-inch Late 2011) Benchmarks. However, it is way behind the nearest Ampere SKU, the GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, which is in the OpenCL chart with 45,898. Geekbench 4.3.4 iMac Performance (March 2019) MaGeekbench 4.3.3 JanuGeekbench 4.3.2 DecemGeekbench 4.3.1 NovemGeekbench 4. The M1 OpenCL scores position the Apple Silicon neatly between the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design (36,196) and the GeForce GTX 1650 (38,361). The average Metal score for the M1 Pro with 16-core GPU over three separate records is 41,371 while a single entry reveals an OpenCL mark of 36,664 points (over 38,000 points has been reported though). Yet again, the M1 Pro destroys anything by the M1, which is hardly a surprise considering the differences in GPU configuration. The Apple SoC and its 10-core CPU has a +40.68% (single) and a +34.30% (multi) advantage over the 10-core Comet Lake desktop chip while not being nearly as power hungry.Īs for graphics, the M1 Pro has been tested in both OpenCL and Metal. 14 nm for the Intel processor) even allows the M1 Pro to demolish the Intel Core i9-10910 that can be found in the 2020 27-inch iMac. ![]() ![]() A more-refined manufacturing process (5 nm vs. This would leave the new Apple Silicon at the top of the Geekbench Mac single-core chart while destroying anything with an M1 in it in the multi-core chart. The M1 Pro tests show a score pattern of around 1,750 points for Geekbench 5 single-core and about 12,100 points for multi-core (current averages would have been artificially lowered by a seemingly outlier of a record). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |